A few days ago, I got an email from my wife's uncle about Michelle Obama serving meals at a soup kitchen. It had an attached picture of a man (who appeared to be there for a meal) taking a picture of her on his cell phone camera. Now, I am not against soup kitchens by any means. And I am not against cell phones. I am not even against people in soup kitchens having cell phones (in fact, it is entirely possible that the individual taking the picture was not there for food at all, but could have understandably just come in off the street to see the First Lady). What I AM against is my generation's entitlement complex. For those of you who haven't seen the email, the text reads:
JUST TOO GOOD TO TRUE !First Lady Michelle Obama showed up Thursday as a surprise and welcome volunteer at Miriam's Kitchen, a soup kitchen for homeless poor people not far from the White House.If this unidentified meal recipient is too poor to buy his own food, how does he afford a cell phone?And if he is homeless, where do they send the cell phone bills?
If, in fact, we have homeless people in America who have cell phones, then doesn't that really mean that we are doing alright. I mean, the doom and gloom we hear sometimes about the "starving" and the "homeless" might be a little melodramatic if they (and by "they," I do mean the starving and homeless) have nicer technology then some of the housed and fed.
What it comes down to is that the real punch line of the joke is that the first question "how does he afford a cell phone?" is rhetorical... we all know how it works. That's a discussion for another day. I just don't like that people can be considered "poverty-stricken" when they drive nice cars, have cell phones, and satellite TV. Pisses me off, really. My wife has gone without a cell phone for 4 years... FOUR YEARS!!! One of the most social people I have ever known. We've been a 1 car family for the same amount of time (with the exception of the last 4 months). I could have bought her a phone, or updated my 3-year-old-been-dropped-so-many-times-it-hardly-works Razor (remember when those were "the thing"). We could have even afforded another car. But we made it work. Some days I needed it and my wife went without. Some days she needed it and I rode my bike or walked (and got in pretty good shape, too... hmmmm). We made it work not because we are better than anybody else, but because we have goals and we want to EARN(!) what we have. It took a lot of work, a lot of faith, and a ton of sacrifice. Sacrifice of the things we wanted at the moment (and still want, some of them): car, cell phones, trips, nice dinners at restaurants. Sacrifice of things we can't get back - time with each other.
Now our country is looking at very bleak economic times and the solutions being offered are bailouts and handouts and tax increases. I recognize that I am not a financial genius, or a history buff, but I know that America has faced similar challenges. And there are individuals still living who faced those challenges. If we were to ask those people how they got through those tough times, I bet the answer includes something our President has not really asked of us. Ask members of "the greatest generation" how they got through The Depression and they will tell you that it was because they went without. They sacrificed. I fear not that this is a crisis. I fear that our President doesn't have the cajones to ask for the one thing that is critical to its recovery; for this entitlement-minded generation to give. And give some more. And not to expect. To produce and not to drain. We will never get out of this mess if Americans (yes, even the "poor") are not asked to sacrifice heavily.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
You know I always have to present an alternative view. I read an article earlier this week and was amazed at how well it ties into your post. This is a small part of it...
Consumption in a market economically is almost always a positive-sum exchange; economic growth, and therefore prosperity, requires more economic activity, not more sacrifice. If the big national problem were a giant war, things might be different—we could all conserve gasoline and save it to fuel the tanks. But it’s hard to see how sacrifice could solve the problem of rapidly rising unemployment.
I'm glad you're starting a blog and look forward to reading it even if I see things a little different.
Ryan
you are right the president wouldnt even sacrifice himself, when the secret services told him of the security issues of having his blackberry. this is the era off the white house with bling
No Ryan, you don't "...always have to present an alternative view."
In fact, you don't have to present a view at all. Your little citation-less excerpt is pretty much nullified by two things: inflation and common sense.
It would have been very appropriate if in 2003 when the war with Iraq kicked off if the American public had been asked to sacrifice.
Oh, and I look forward to reading more posts. Welcome to the blogosphere or whatever they call it these days!
Ryan, my perception of Dan's thoughts would be that one of the things that ails us, is a very large amount of irresponsible consumption. That people learning to live within, or under their means (sacrifice) would be something that we, the citizens could do to help get us back on track.
As to the current administration, they will not be happy until they have the Socialist Country they desire.
Dan, look forward to what you have to say, love to your Bride.
Uncle Bill
Dan,
I know I'm posting this a little late, but its been mulling around in my head and I had to get it out. First off, it makes sense that a homeless person would have a cell phone, he couldn't have a landline if he doesn't have a home. Maybe the bill goes to a p.o. box or a friend.
Your comment reflects the conservative viewpoint that the poor are unworthy (of assistance) and selfish. This runs counter to the liberal viewpoint that the rich are unworthy (of assistance - ie. less taxes) and selfish.
The problem is is that both sides are right... and wrong. There are unworthy poor who abuse the system and there are unworthy rich who abuse the system. That doesn't mean that you throw the baby out with the bath water.
But I do think that the government should rely more on the private sector to help the poor. I would imagine that the amount of help the government provides to the poor is inverse to the amount that the private sector are charitable.
I doubt that the President would ask us to go without since we don't want it. I think you're right, economic recession is what we need to kick us in the butt. I'm not sure if Grandma considered it a sacrifice to do what she did, she just did it. We all have to decide what we want. I don't envy the guy at the homeless shelter, his life sucks - as evidenced by the high crime rates and drug use found among the poor. I'm happy with the choices I am making even though sometimes it is hard. Because cell phones, nice cars and satellite tvs are a hollow substitute for integrity.
Post a Comment